data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e965/0e965adb7a02633c22644e63afd0d20128480a88" alt=""
[Stealth PACs Money Trail]
Only through inactive action does one become a victim; by exercising proactive action against evil one walks in their own power creating resistance to that which chooses to destroy humanity and the preciousness of life. Fight America; don't become a victim to the evil that is destroying our world! _Donald F. Truax (Tough times don't last, tough people do)
Is the NSA Conducting Electronic Warfare On Americans?
Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy - National Security Archive FOIA Audit
Seymour Hersh on Obama, NSA and the 'pathetic' American media - IBM & "Death's Calculator"
What is the Hegelian Dialectic? - The Guardian's NSA Files - Church Committee Reports
The Hegelian Dialectic - U.S. Pavlovian Conditioning - NUREMBERG TRAILS PROJECT
Hegel for Beginners, by Llyod Spencer and Andrzej Krauze - Project MUSE - Operation Gladio
The Edward Bernays "Propaganda" Essays - SLHS Series
Free E-Book Download: Edward Bernays, "Propaganda"
Deconstructing Edward Bernays' 'Propaganda' (Part 1) - (Part 4) - (Part 7) - (Part 10)
Deconstructing Edward Bernays' 'Propaganda' (Part 2) - (Part 5) - (Part 8)
Deconstructing Edward Bernays' 'Propaganda' (Part 3) - (Part 6) - (Part 9)
The economic elite have escalated their attack on the U.S. public by surging military operations in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
As ObamaC.H.A.N.G.E. announced plans for escalating the war effort, it has become clear that the ObamaC.H.A.N.G.E Illusion has taken yet another horrifying turn. Before explaining how the Af-Pak surge is a direct attack on the US public, let’s peer through the illusion and look at the reality of the situation.
Now that the much despised George W. BushFRAUD is out of the way and a more popular figurehead is doing PR for Dick Cheney’s right-hand military leader Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who is leading his second AF-Pak surge now, and with long time BushFRAUD family confidant Robert Gates still running the Defense Department, the masters of war have never had it so good.
Barack ObamaC.H.A.N.G.E, the anti-war candidate, has proven to be a perfect decoy for the military industrial complex. Consider all the opposition and bad press BushFRAUD received when he announced the surge in Iraq. Then consider this:
I: TROOP DEPLOYMENTS
The BushFRAUD surge in Iraq deployed an extra 28,000 US troops. Under ObamaC.H.A.N.G.E, back in March, a surge in Afghanistan, that also further escalated operations inside Pakistan, deployed an extra 21,000 troops. However, in an unannounced and underreported move, ObamaC.H.A.N.G.E. added 13,000 more troops to that surge to bring the total to 34,000 troops. ObamaC.H.A.N.G.E. actually outdid BushFRAUD’s surge by 6000 troops and brought the overall number of US troops in Afghanistan to 68,000, double the number there when BushFRAUD left office.
Where opposition was fierce to BushFRAUD’s surge, barely any opposition was expressed during ObamaC.H.A.N.G.E’s surge. Part of the reason for so little political and public backlash was the cleverly orchestrated psychological operation to announce the beginning of US troop withdrawal from Iraq. While the drawdown in Iraq has been greatly exaggerated in the US mainstream media, as of October, ObamaC.H.A.N.G.E still had 124,000 troops deployed in Iraq (not counting private military contractors).
When ObamaC.H.A.N.G.E casts the illusion of a 2011 withdrawal from Afghanistan, one just needs look at the reality of the situation with the over-hyped withdrawal in Iraq.
Now, with Obama’sC.H.A.N.G.E latest surge announcement he will again be adding a minimum of another 30,000 US soldiers. This means that ObamaC.H.A.N.G.E has now led a bigger surge than BushFRAUD… on two separate occasions within the past nine months of his new administration. ObamaC.H.A.N.G.E has now escalated deployments in the Af-Pak region to 98,000 US troops. So in Af-Pak and Iraq, he will now have a total of 222,000 US troops deployed, 36,000 more than BushFRAUD ever had – 186,000 was BushFRAUD’s highest total.
PRIVATE MILITARY AND NATO DEPLOYMENTS
The amount of private military contractors deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan is rarely reported on in the US mainstream press, but a Congressional Research Service investigation into this revealed that a record high 69% active duty soldiers are in fact private mercenaries.
Although the administration is yet to disclose how many private mercenaries will be deployed in the latest surge, it is believed that the 69% ratio will remain in tact.
The Pentagon released a report showing that Obama already had a total of 242,657 private contractors in action, as of June 30th. 119,706 of them in Iraq, 73,968 in Afghanistan, with 50,061 active in “other US CENTCOM locations.”
===snipped===> "And Ye Shall Know The Truth And The Truth Shall Set You Free"
WAKE UP AMERICA....ITs OUR COUNTRY!!!
Love "Light" and Energy
_Don
References:
[Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline (TAP/TAPI)]
[700 Military Bases Spread Across Afghanistan]
[Ambassador Eikenberry's Cables on U.S. Strategy in Afghanistan]
[Afghanistan's Development Debacle]
[Has Obama Made a Devil's Bargain With Israel?]
[A time to break silence] By Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
[Iraq invasion in 2003 was illegitimate: Dutch probe]
[President Obama, the CIA and the Master of Cover-Up]
[Two Blackwater Guards Arrested For Murder: Company Settles Lawsuits]
[As of October 2009 2,038 Afghan civilians have died as a direct result of the U.S.led operations]
[Pentagon's Military "Mentoring" Program & Defence Contracting Firm(s)]
[The 5 Myths of Keeping America Safe from Terrorism]
[Up to 56,000 more contractors for Afghanistan]
[Are Presidents Afraid of the CIA?]
[ACLU Blasts Obama on Bush's Crimes]
[Mr. President, War Is Not Peace]
[Obama attorneys step up defense of torture memo author]
[U.S. State Department Misleading About Reason For U.S. War With Afghanistan?]
[Kucinich: Prolonging Afghan war a ‘threat to our national security’]
[Instead of disengaging from Afghanistan, Obama escalates war]
[Epicenter of Mendacity: The Illegal War Against Afghanistan]
[Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (T-A-P-I)]
[UnDeR CoNtRaCt - ArMy Of DoLlAr$$$]
What mysterious influence could account for this remarkable turn of events, Pavlov wondered. So, being a good scientist, he studied carefully what had transpired while he was away from the dogs. They had been left without food or warmth. They had been isolated for days; some of them had drowned. They had been subjected to extreme stress, never knowing if they would live or die. These were the factors that had produced the washing away of the previous conditioning from the dogs' brains - brain-washing.
Pavlov and other Russians followed up this line of research, but it was the Chinese communists in the 1950s who first saw its real potential for use with human beings. They employed these very principles in brainwashing American and other Allied prisoners of war during the Korean conflict. Isolation, periodic denial of food or water, cold and exposure, extreme stress associated with uncertainty of life or death--these conditions, together with a continual barrage of indoctrination produced the erasing of previous beliefs and behavior patterns in American soldiers in particular. Thus brainwashing became phase two in the evolution of human behavior control.
But brainwashing is not very reliable, as the remarkable film "The Manchurian Candidate" shows. The trigger mechanisms can be tampered with, sometimes even erased, before the desired behavior can be carried out.
These procedures are only used now by the CIA and other intelligence services for programming special assassins (see the movie "Parallax View"). Neither classic Pavlovian conditioning nor brainwashing can produce the general results that black-budget project directors in intelligence services desire: absolute control of a human personality.
===snipped===> "And Ye Shall Know The Truth And The Truth Shall Set You Free"References:
[Related: The Torture Matrix Operational Collection Database]
Main Core also allegedly draws on four smaller databases that, in turn, cull from federal, state, and local “intelligence” reports; print and broadcast media; financial records; “commercial databases”; and unidentified “private sector entities.” Additional information comes from a database known as the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment, which generates watch lists from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence for use by airlines, law enforcement, and border posts. According to the Washington Post, the Terrorist Identities list has quadrupled in size between 2003 and 2007 to include about 435,000 names. The FBI’s Terrorist Screening Center border crossing list, which listed 755,000 persons as of fall 2007, grows by 200,000 names a year. A former NSA officer tells Radar that the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, using an electronic-funds transfer surveillance program, also contributes data to Main Core, as does a Pentagon program that was created in 2002 to monitor anti-war protestors and environmental activists such as Greenpeace etc.
[Using Virtual Reality to Document Human Existence, Gregory Peter Panos, PersonaForm, Beverly Hills:]
www.wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/Report/NBIC_report.pdf [Cut and Paste URL to Download]
www.wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/1/NBIC_frontmatter.pdf [Cut and Paste URL to Download]
[Means of Information War, Threaten Democracy and Mankind, by Mojmir Babacek]
[Strategic Personality Simulation: A New Strategic Concept by Dr. Norman D. Livergood]
[Behavioral Influences Analysis Center]
[Cognitive engineering and behavior/decision making odeling/prediction:]
[Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance:]
[British Telecom sponsored Soul Catcher project:]
http://news.cnet.com/A-new-memory-chip--for-the-brain/2100-1001_3-218102.html
[A serious proposal for personality transfer/modeling using neural nets:]
[Artificial Metempsychosis. A Search Of Methodology For Personality Simulation; Mikhail Solovyov, Department of Biophysics, St. Petersburg University, Russia, 1992]: www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/dsp.cgi?msg=2879.2
[Government Collecting DNA Secretly [WHY]
But in order to meet this December deadline, several agencies would have to forgo a review of the affected historical records, which they are unwilling to do. And so it seems they will simply be excused from compliance. But in order to modify the deadline in the Bush order, it will be necessary to issue another executive order. If the comprehensive new ObamaC.H.A.N.G.E order on classification policy (which would assign processing of such records to a National Declassification Center that does not yet exist) is not ready for release by December 31, then another stand-alone order would have to be issued, canceling or extending the looming deadline. And officials are reluctant to issue such an order since they say it would be awkward for the avowedly pro-openness ObamaC.H.A.N.G.E. Administration to relax or annul a declassification requirement that was imposed by the ultra-secret BushFRAUD Administration.
In fact, the whole process has become an awkward mix of exaggerated and deflated expectations. The failure of the BushFRAUD Administration’s declassification deadline to take hold this year does not augur well for new, more ambitious efforts to advance classification reform. If the “automatic declassification” procedures that were prescribed in prior executive orders are not “automatic” after all, and if binding deadlines can be extended more or less at will, then any new declassification requirements in the ObamaC.H.A.N.G.E order will be similarly subject to doubt or defiance.
===snipped===>References:
[Distorting & Undermining Institutional Accountability & The U.S. legal system]
[Obama Commits to Declassification] Lets hope it's not all 'Smoke" & "Mirrors"
[Secret reports, Secret budgets, Secret operations, Secret courts]
[EPIC Files Appeal for NSA Policy on Network Surveillance]
[State Secrets Privilege: The Puppets & Puppet Masters]
[Draft Order Would Set New Limits on Classification]
[CRYPTOME DMCA Notice of Infringing Material]
[Defense Secretary Gates on Leaks]
[Litigation Documents: EFF v. CIA]
[Our President Obama C.H.A.N.G.E]
Each Department is managed by a secretary, nominated by the president, and approved by congress. These managers (secretaries) are the "magician's assistants". And they are responsible for stealing the rabbit, while your watching the magic show. As a general rule, the less public visibility a department secretary has, the more money that bureaucratic empire is diverting (stealing).
Each bureaucratic empire, guided by a magician's assistant (the secretary), creates an annual budget that is submitted to congress and the president for review and approval. 90% of the time, approval is automatic. In other words, most of the time congress and the president don't tell the bureaucratic empires how to spend money, just how much money to spend.
A typical department budget consists of hundreds (sometimes thousands) of individual items or programs with obscure names, and vague definitions. The diversion of American tax revenue into covert projects is accomplished piecemeal, through these budgetary items. A little bit from one item, a little more from another. No one really knows the exact amount of diversion taking place. Estimates run as high as 60% of the entire federal budget as being diverted into clandestine projects through this mechanism.
The trick behind the magic:
A short review of some department budget items will prove useful in understanding the mechanics of how the diversion is accomplished. I shall use the DOE (department of energy) proposed budget for fiscal year 2006. This document is publicly available at the DOE website.
According to the document, proposed DOE budget for 2006 is $23.4 billion dollars, and represents a decline of $475 million dollars from the 2005 budget which, and I quote: "shows DOE's commitment to results-driven performance." This is utter non-sense, as I shall demonstrate.
===snipped===> "And Ye Shall Know The Truth And The Truth Shall Set You Free"
WAKE UP AMERICA....ITs OUR COUNTRY!!!
Love "Light" and Energy
_Don
References:
[Afghanistan's Development Debacle] UNDP Investagation
[Prostitution in the US Government]
[The NED, NGOs and the Imperial Uses]
[Spies for Hire - Covert Government @ it's Best]
[Secret reports, Secret budgets, Secret operations, Secret courts]
[PentaCON tried to intimate U.S.Journalist]
Quote:
At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it? Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step the Ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth in their military chest; with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years. At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.
Abraham Lincoln, January 27, 1838
Saturday, November 14, 2009 - Bill of Attainder
Definition: A legislative act that singles out an individual or group for punishment without a trial.
The Constitution of the
"The Bill of Attainder Clause was intended not as a narrow, technical (and therefore soon to be outmoded) prohibition, but rather as an implementation of the separation of powers, a general safeguard against legislative exercise of the judicial function or more simply - trial by legislature."
"These clauses of the Constitution are not of the broad, general nature of the Due Process Clause, but refer to rather precise legal terms which had a meaning under English law at the time the Constitution was adopted. A bill of attainder was a legislative act that singled out one or more persons and imposed punishment on them, without benefit of trial. Such actions were regarded as odious by the framers of the Constitution because it was the traditional role of a court, judging an individual case, to impose punishment." William H. Rehnquist, The Supreme Court, page 166.
"Bills of attainder, ex post facto laws, and laws impairing the obligations of contracts, are contrary to the first principles of the social compact, and to every principle of sound legislation. ... The sober people of
===snipped===> "And Ye Shall Know The Truth And The Truth Shall Set You Free"
WAKE UP
_Don
References:
[Judge grants injunction against Congressional defunding of ACORN]
[Update: High Court To Take Up Case Involving Part of Patriot Act]
Supreme Court cases construing the Bill of Attainder clause include:
Ex Parte Garland, 4 Wallace 333 (1866)
Cummings v. Missouri, 4 Wallace 277 (1866)
U.S. v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437 (1965)
Nixon v. Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S.425 (1977)
Selective Service Administration v. Minnesota PIRG, 468 U.S. 841 (1984)
Rep. Grayson Schools Republican Congressman in Debate
[Personal Stories of American Injustice]
[Political Chicanery In The Old Dominion]
[Judges Plead Guilty in Scheme to Jail Youths for Profit]
[Whistleblower Puts Virginia Supreme Court on Trial]
[Distorting & Undermining Institutional Accountability & The U.S. legal system]
[Judge John Walker, George Walker Bush’s Cousin, Judges April Gallop’s Suit]
[List of federal judges appointed by George W. Bush]
[Money trails lead to Bush judges]
[George W. Bush–Still With Us (In Black Robes)]