The 9/11 Operation - Seeding The Terrorist Meme - 1993 World Trade Center Bombing (1) (Updated 30 September 2014)

By Paul DeRienzo et. al. - Posting #214 - Government Foreknowledge

Updated 25 February 2014 - EXCLUSIVE: FBI had human source in contact with bin Laden as far back as 1993

Who Bombed The World Trade Center? FBI Bomb Builders Exposed

Oct. 1994/Jan. 1995 Issue -- New York Terrorism Indictments  (Seeding) 

Two cassette tape recordings, obtained by SHADOW reporter Paul DeRienzo of telephone conversations between FBI informant Emad Salem and his Bureau contacts reveal secret U.S. Government complicity in the February 26, 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in New York City in which six people were killed and more than a thousand were injured.

After careful deliberation, the SHADOW believes the question regarding the bombing boils down to the following: Did the FBI do the bombing, utilizing informant Salem as an "agent provocateur" or did it fail to prevent an independent Salem and his associates from doing it? The taped conversations obtained by the SHADOW seem to indicate the former:

FBI Informant Edam Salem: "...we was start already building the bomb which is went off in the World Trade Center. It was built by supervising supervision from the Bureau and the DA and we was all informed about it and we know that the bomb start to be built. By who? By your confidential informant. What a wonderful great case!" [Listen]

Who is Emad Salem? FBI bomber, Arab double-agent or just greedy? Possibly a combination of all three. Salem is a former Egyptian Army officer who is currently the U.S. government's star witness against Egyptian cleric Dr. Omar Abdel Rahman, whom the FBI says was the ringleader in several bombing plots, including the World Trade Center. Shortly after the bombing at the Twin Towers (World Trade Center) the U.S. government moved to take Salem into the Witness Protection program.

According to the FBI, Salem was aware of the plot ostensibly because he had infiltrated Sheik Rahman and his associates. He was recruited as a government informant shortly after the 1991 assassination of of right- wing militant Rabbi Meir Kahane. As an associate of Rahman, Salem traveled in the cleric's inner circle, surreptitiously recording conversations, and selling his information to the Bureau. But unknown to his FBI handlers, Salem was also secretly recording his conversations with them, most likely to protect himself.

According to attorney Ron Kuby, after Salem was taken into the Witness Protection program on June 24, 1993, he told the feds about the more than 1,000 conversations he had recorded sometime between December, 1991 and June, 1993. Kuby says that while some of these tapes are not significant, others contain substantive dealings with Salem and his FBI handlers. Salem was actually bugging the FBI.

The World Trade Center bombing, along with subsequent alleged plots to bomb prominent targets in New York City, spawned a number of federal indictments and trials resulting in the conviction of more than a dozen men, all of Arabic descent. Salem's exposure as a government informant who had a year earlier infiltrated the group of men later charged in the bombing conspiracy caused many to wonder why he and the FBI failed to provide any warning of the pending World Trade Center bombing.

The answer now appears self-evident. According to William Kuntsler, attorney for Ibrahim El-Gabrowny, one of those accused in the larger bombing case, the entire conspiracy was the product of Salem, the government informant. Kuntsler's law partner Ronald Kuby told the SHADOW that within hours of the World Trade Center blast, Salem checked into a midtown hospital, complaining of a loud ringing in his ears. There is a growing belief that some of the four men charged and since convicted and jailed for the World Trade Center bombing, Mohammed Aboulihma, Mohammed Salameh, Nidal Ayyad and Ahmad Ajaj, may be innocent [victims] of a government frame-up.

Attorneys for those convicted have maintained that the government's case is circumstantial at best, with no evidence or motive linking the accused with the bombing. The FBI and federal prosecutors have not as yet responded to questions over the lack of warning of the attack on the Twin Towers, despite the strategic placement of their informant.

Two possible scenarios emerge. One: Salem is a rogue FBI informant who created the conspiracy to bomb the World Trade Center for the money his information about the plot (minus his role) would bring. An attorney for one of the convicted men told the SHADOW that Salem was an FBI informant from November of 1991 to the summer of 1992. The attorney says that the FBI became aware of the World Trade Center bombing plot through informant Salem during this period, but they refused to believe his information or pay Salem's exorbitant fees. In fact, the feds claimed that they dropped Salem as an informant during the summer of 1992 after he refused or failed a lie detector test. This left Salem with a bombing plot but no one to sell it to.

According to the attorney, Salem let the plot that he hatched go forward and the World Trade Center was bombed so that he could get money and publicity. The attorney says that within 48 hours of the bombing, the FBI requested Salem to help them solve the case. Salem quickly pointed the fingers at the defendants, all followers of Sheik Rahman.

So, who did it? From the above point of view, Salem constructed the bomb plot with those whom he subsequently set up. The U.S. government and its FBI were innocent bystanders who failed to prevent the carnage due to their unwillingness to take Salem's claims seriously, despite his close collaboration with Bureau agents for the better part of a year.

The other scenario looks like this: Informant Salem organized the bomb plot with the "supervision" of the FBI and the District Attorney as part of a classic entrapment setup. He befriended certain individuals, possibly some of the defendants, convinced them that his intentions to bomb the W The bomb goes off. Greedy Salem, with his ears still ringing, sells out his accomplices while attempting to sell more information to the Bureau. In order to protect him and their relationship, the FBI sequesters Salem and utilizes him against the real target of the FBI, Sheik Rahman.

In one of the taped conversations between Salem and "Special Agent" John Anticev, Salem refers to him and the Bureau's involvement in making the bomb that blew up the World Trade Center. As Salem is pressing for money while emphasizing his value as a Bureau asset, the conversation moves in and out of references to the bombing and the FBI's knowledge of the bomb making:

FBI: But ah basically nothing has changed. I'm just telling you for my own sake that nothing, that this isn't a salary but you got paid regularly for good information. I mean the expenses were a little bit out of the ordinary and it was really questioned. Don't tell Nancy I told you this. (Nancy Floyd is another FBI agent who worked with Salem in his informant capacity. The second tape obtained by the SHADOW is of a telephone conversation between Salem and Floyd -Ed.)

SALEM: Well, I have to tell her of course.

FBI: Well then, if you have to, you have to.

SALEM: Yeah, I mean because the lady was being honest and I was being honest and everything was submitted with receipts and now it's questionable.

FBI: It's not questionable, it's like a little out of the' ordinary.

SALEM: Okay. I don't think it was. If that what you think guys, fine, but I don't think that because we was start already building the bomb which is went off in the World Trade Center. It was built by supervising supervision from the Bureau and the DA and we was all informed about it and we know what the bomb start to be built. By who? By your confidential informant. What a wonderful great case! And then he put his head in the sand I said "Oh, no, no, that's not true, he is son of a bitch." (Deep breath) Okay. It's built with a different way in another place and that's it.

FBI: No, don't make any rash decisions. I'm just trying to be as honest with you as I can.

SALEM: Of course, I appreciate that. - contact Paul DeRienzo

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!....Its "OUR" country!!!

Love "Light" and Energy

_Don

References: Illusion of Justice (Added 09.30.2014) 

Government agents 'directly involved' in most high-profile US terror plots (Added 09.30.2014)

Port Authority Found Negligent in 1993 Bombing

Inside the FBI's 'Terror factory' Published on Jan 30, 2013

FBI – Salem (1)

FBI – Salem (2)

FBI Linked To Bombing

The FBI And The Mad Bombers

1993 World Trade Center bombing

Damage Caused by the 1993 WTC Bombing

Did the FBI bomb the World Trade Center in 1993?

The FBI Allowed the 1993 WTC Bombing to Happen

FBI Blunders and the First World Trade Center Bombing

Federal Government SAIC Blast Analysis of WTC prior 911

Bomb Informer's Tapes Give Rare Glimpse of F.B.I. Dealings

Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast

World Trade Center 1st Bombing Helped by FBI and CIA

January 4, 1984: Alleged Terrorist Plot to Bomb WTC Uncovered

January 17, 1984: Port Authority Terrorist Intelligence Unit Issues Report on WTC Security

July 1989: FBI Monitors Future Bombers Weapons Training Sessions; Fail to Follow Up

January 7-13, 1993: FBI Cancels Monitored Meetings that Could Expose WTC Bomb Plot

February 26, 1993: WTC Is Bombed but Does Not Collapse, as Bombers Had Hoped

--->After February 26, 1993: Threat Assessments Predict Possibility of Terrorists Crashing Plane into WTC

--->After February 26, 1993: Security Chief Predicts Terrorists Flying Plane into WTC

--->After February 26, 1993-1994: FBI Fails to Close Branches of Al-Qaeda’s ‘Operational Headquarters’ in US

OPSEC, The 9/11 Operation, and the “DAMS” process (continued:) Link Updated 02.26.2015

By Donald F. Truax - Posting #213 - The 9/11 Operation

Senator, to continue, if one does a chronological overlay of U.S. Govt. policy starting in 1992 through 2001 the 9/11 Operation comes into clear view with respect to the DAMS five discreet phases as shown below. For emphasis, OPSEC P111 list it somewhat different, but, the point here is that OPSEC operations and it's doctrine are what allows the government to run SCADs operations covertly hidden from public view designed with “plausible denial-ability” via compartmentalized components that keep each component of the operation separate should anyone ever try to reverse engineer the said operation.

Applying OPSEC to Govt Acquisitions as of 26/Oct/2010 [.pdf]

P111 Applying OPSEC to U.S. Government Contracts as of 2001 [.pdf]

p.14-#8 states: Effectively obtaining these goods and services ofter "requires effective management of a complex acquisition system encompassing the design, engineering, construction, testing, deployment, sustainment, and disposal of weapons or related items acquired under contract".

The DoD Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) identifies and validates DoD capability requirements through a document known as the Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)

The Defense Acquisition Management System (DAMS) seeks out the best material acquisition alternatives and strategies for fulfilling the ICD requirement communicated by the JCIDS in accordance with the law (FAR DoDI 5000.1/5000.2)

The DOD Acquisition Management System (DAMS); DAMS consist of five "discreet phases":

In 1986 SAIC performed a "security" assessment of the World Trade Center Complex that would have encompassed a review of the structural stress-points of the World Trade Center buildings. Effectively, this specific information would have been pertinent in developing, designing, and engineering a controlled demolition (to include munitions) that would have been both effective and successful in bringing down such structures as the World Trade Center buildings in their "own footprint" in under ten (10) seconds.

The designing, engineering and construction of demolitions for the 9/11 operation against the World Trade Center Complex:

0. World Trade Center Security Assessments: SAIC World Trade Center Security Assessments

The testing of munitions against the structural foundation of the World Trade Center Complex:

1. Material Solution Analysis Phase (MSA): SAICWorld Trade Center Bombing (1) Blast Analysis 1993

The deployment and sustainment of developed weapons for the controlled demolitions of the World Trade Center Complex:

2. Technology Development Phase (TD): SAIC World Trade Center Upgrades 1993 - 2002

3. Engineering and Manufacturing Development Phase (EMD): SAIC World Trade Center Upgrades 1993 - 2002

4. Production and Deployment Phase (PD): SAIC World Trade Center Upgrades 1993 - 2002

The execution of the 9/11 operation and disposal of developed weapons used in the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center complex:

5. Operations and Maintenance Phase (OM): SAIC City Time Payroll Project - SAIC at ground “0” on the morning of 9/11

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!....Its "OUR" country!!!

Love "Light" and Energy

_Don

References:

Prevent the Reemergence of a New Rival

State Crimes Against Democracy

Applying OPSEC to Govt Acquisitions as of 26/Oct/2010

SAIC World Trade Center Security Assessments

SAIC Engineering

The FBI Allowed the 1993 WTC Bombing to Happen (WHY?)

U.S. Government - SAIC Blast Analysis of WTC prior 911

SAIC 1993 World Trade Center Blast Analysis

SAIC World Trade Center Upgrades 1993 - 2002

SAIC World Trade Center Upgrades 1993 - 2002

SAIC World Trade Center Upgrades 1993 - 2002

The 9/11 Stand Down

SAIC CityTime Corruption Case

The New Mobile Infantry

SAIC Whistleblower: Offices Empty On The Morning Of 9/11 - Links Updated 02.16.2016

By Donald F. Truax - Posting #209 - Systemic Security Failures

The Whistleblower That "Govt." Whistleblowers Don't Dare Talk About

1.SAIC did the security assessment on the World Trade Center 1986.

2.SAIC offices where empty at Herndon Virginia on the morning of 9/11.

3.SAIC did the "Blast Analysis" on the World Trade Center 1993.

4.SAIC was at ground zero on the morning of 9/11. (see Wired)

5.SAIC had employees on the 9/11 commission staff.

6.SAIC Contributed to the NIST 9/11 commission report.

7.SAIC was involved in the NYC government in the summer before 9/11. (See: Valchichs Letter p.4. par#3) 

8.SAIC was involved in (it was their program) the NSA/FBI failed Trailblazer program that buried Thinthread.

9.SAIC was instrumental in pushing for the Iraq war.

10.SAIC employee David Kay pushed for the Iraq War. (See: link b, link c, link :D)

11.SAIC employee General Wayne Downing help developed the Iraq War Plan. (See: The Iraq War)

12.SAIC was involved in the Paul Wolfawitz Shaha Riza scandal. (See: payroll records, link c)

13.SAIC former employee Steven Hatfill accused of mailing anthrax letters. (See: depositions)

14.SAIC received major reconstruction contracts for Iraq.

15.SAIC employee David Kay chaired the Iraq Survey Group

16.SAIC with conflicts of interest did the "Risk Assessment" on Diebolds voting machine. (See: link c, d, e)

17.SAIC is an international corporation.

18.SAIC holds partnership with the Serco Group who is a key NSA contractor.

19.SAIC is owned by Neoconservatives. (See: Neocon NSA power grab)

20.SAIC is connected to the Carlyle Group.

21.SAIC owns 50% of the AMEC corporation. (See: Connect The Dots)

22.SAIC is involved in demolitions research and weapons technology.

23.SAIC contributed to the Bush/Obama election campaign.

24.SAIC is a major contractor for Fusion Centers across America. (See: Fusion Centers Forge Ahead) 

25.SAIC Global Information Grid-Bandwidth Expansion Contract 2001.

26.SAIC former employee William A. Owens was vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the second-ranking military officer in the United States.

27.SAIC former employee Bobby Ray Inman is a former Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, a former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA), a former director of Naval Intelligence, and a former Vice Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency.

28.SAIC former employee Robert M. Gates is a former SAIC board member and a veteran of the Iran-Contra scandal.

29.SAIC former employee Khidir Hamza was an Iraq defector who falsely testified about WMD in Iraq. ( See: b,c,d,e )

30.SAIC former employee C. Ryan Henry, corporate vice president for strategic assessment and development for the San Diego-based defense contractor Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC), leaves to become deputy to Douglas Feith, head of the Defense Department's policy office.

31.SAIC's vice chairman, Admiral William Owens (Ret.), was a member of the Defense Policy Board, advising Donald Rumsfeld. The company's board members include Gen. Wayne Downing (Ret.), who also worked on domestic and international business development for the company, and was a member of the board of The Committee for the Liberation of Iraq.

32.SAIC former employee Jerome Hauer is a Bio-Warfare expert who is well known in New York City for having created former mayor Rudolph Giuliani’s Office of Emergency Management (OEM) in World Trade Center 7 – the building that inexplicably imploded in a freefall on September 11, 2001, without having been hit by an airplane. Hauer’s corporate affiliations include SAIC, Batelle, CSC-DynCorp, Hollis-Eden, and one of the nation’s most powerful private investigative and security firms Kroll Inc., among others. Now BioPort has been added to his resume.

33. SAIC former employee Jerome Hauer became director of the federal Office of Public Health Preparedness (OPHP) in 2002, succeeding Dr. D. A. Henderson from Johns Hopkins Institute... ...Hauer is controversial among those who are able to connect the dots between his person and shady business deals in biopharmacy since 1998. More interesting, he seems to have had prior knowledge about both so called terrorist-attacks: September 11th and Anthrax. But many private investigators claim since months, he let the attacks happen on purpose to continue his career. Is Hauer Lihopsuspect No.1? He started to work for the NIH under Tommy Thompson on September 10, 2001 as an adviser on national security. On September 11th, he told the White House to take Cipro, the antibiotic that works against the anthrax virus, without bothering to reveal his warning to the American nation.

34. SAIC former employee Duane Andrews  who considered Dick Cheney to be his personal, lifelong hero. While he worked for Cheney, Andrews supervised Stephen Cambone, who went on to become Donald Rumsfeld’s “special assistant.” When Andrews left the Pentagon in 1993, he became chief operating officer for SAIC, where he supervised “much of the company's work on secret projects with defense and national security agencies.” Andrews and Cambone both later hired on to the British intelligence firm Qinetiq, along with George Tenet. Coincidentally, The Carlyle Group was a major shareholder in Qinetiq as of February 2003. (See: link b, c)

35. In the 1990s, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), run by Dick Cheney’s protégé Duane Andrews, trained the Saudi Navy and  instructed Saudi military personnel at its company headquarters in San Diego. SAIC had a greater impact on counterterrorism programs in the United States than any other non-government entity and it profited greatly from 9/11.

While SAIC was training the Saudi Navy, the Carlyle/BDM subsidiary Vinnell Corporation was training the Saudi Arabian National Guard.  Simultaneously, Booz Allen Hamilton was managing the Saudi Marine Corps and running the Saudi Armed Forces Staff College.

36. SAIC installed the Saudi naval command, control, and communications C3 system in the early l980s. The current program involves about 50 technicians employed to maintain and upgrade the system. After the C3 system was commissioned and initial training had been completed, the SAIC staff began a phase-down. The Gulf War demonstrated a significant need for both software and systems upgrades, however, and MODA negotiated a staff increase and contract extension with SAIC.

A few more questions concerning SAIC and 9/11? As stated in Valcichs letter p.4., line item #3:

In the summer of 2001, it was suggested that SAIC do a "phased" pilot so that some aspect fo CityTime could be implemented before the change in Administration. This was conditional on SAIC completing the Pilot Phase 1 by year-end, viz. December 2001.

But the city discovered that the status of the builds had been misrepresented. Build 4A was nowhere near completion. This "contrasted drastically" with what had been represented to the City. It's been a year and a half since then and SAIC is yet to complete the Release 1A test: and of course OPA and FISA have yet to be implemented. In fact the date for their implementation has been delayed three times, totaling 11 months.

Specifically, how many offices did SAIC have in NYC?
Specifically, how many offices of SAIC where empty in NYC/VA on the morning of 9/11?
Specifically, who where the engineers on the SAIC team for Build 1-4A in the summer of 2001?
Specifically, how many SAIC engineers did the team comprise of?
Specifically, what where their backgrounds, and skills-sets?
Specifically, what was the specific geolocation address of the City-Time project?
Specifically, was there more than one geoloacation of the City-Time project?
Specifically, how close to the World Trade Center Complex was the City-Time project in the summer of 2001?
Specifically, was the SAIC City-Time team doing work in any of the World Trade Center buildings in the summer of 2001?
Specifically, what "other" government contracts/projects both classified or unclassified was SAIC working on in NYC prior to 9/11 that have yet to be made public?

                                                  June 2001 FBI SAIC Allegations

In June 2001 the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) paid SAIC $122 million to create a Virtual Case File (VCF) software system to speed up the sharing of information among agents. But the FBI abandoned VCF when it failed to function adequately. Robert Mueller, FBI Director, testified to a congressional committee, "When SAIC delivered the first product in December 2003 we immediately identified a number of deficiencies – 17 at the outset. That soon cascaded to 50 or more and ultimately to 400 problems with that software ... We were indeed disappointed."  SAIC executive vice president Arnold L. Punaro claimed that the company had "fully conformed to the contract we have and gave the taxpayers real value for their money." He blamed the FBI for the initial problems, saying the agency had a parade of program managers and demanded too many design changes. During 15 months that SAIC worked on the program, 19 different government managers were involved and 36 contract modifications were ordered, he said.

                                        SAIC at Ground Zero On The Morning of 9/11

Coincidentally, the story of Special Forces expert John Blitch and "Ground Zero" began on the first day of his employment with SAIC: September 11, 2001. According to Wired magazine, on 9/11/01 John Blitch happened to be leaving his position as a Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army's Special Forces to direct the Center for Intelligent Robotics and Unmanned Systems at the Science Applications International Corporation facility in Colorado. John Blitch had been charged by the U.S. Army's Special Forces with heading the Defense Department's Tactical Mobile Robots Program within the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, over the preceding three years.

According to Kevin Ryan, John Blitch had also been in his U.S. Army career chief of unmanned systems at the U.S. Special Operations Command (US SOCOM), a Command which conducts "covert and clandestine missions", and John Blitch had also won an award for his 'ground-breaking research in robot assisted search and rescue conducted during the Oklahoma City Bombing response.' According the Association for Computing Machinery, John Blitch used his Oklahoma City research to 'develop many of the robot platforms that were eventually used at the WTC.'

                                  Ohio replaces voting machine reviewer SAIC (link b, c, d)

Secretary of State Ken Blackwell has replaced a firm slated to help conduct the security review of Ohio''s newly certified voting machines -- after his office discovered that the firm had a financial interest in one of the machine makers. The decision followed his office''s discovery that an arm of Science Applications International Corp. had promised to make a $5 million investment that would benefit Hart Intercivic. Hart was one of four voting machine vendors qualified this summer to sell voting machines to Ohio counties. SAIC, a Fortune 500 research and engineering firm, was to share the job of reviewing the firms'' machines and software. The review was to identify security weaknesses that might jeopardize the integrity of next year''s presidential election. [...] Blackwell said his office''s procedures for identifying potential conflicts "surfaced a potential area of conflict [for SAIC] that saved us from embarrassment and probably legal entanglements." His decision to disqualify SAIC also headed off a second potential conflict for SAIC: It shares a lobbyist with another of Ohio''s preferred vendors, Diebold Election Systems. (

The Case of the Diebold FTP Site

EXCLUSIVE: LEAKED 2003 REPORT ON MARYLAND'S DIEBOLD VOTING SYSTEMS REVEALS SERIOUS SECURITY CONCERNS WERE WITHHELD FROM ELECTION BOARD, GOVERNOR, PUBLIC!

See: Gmap #1 - Gmap #2

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!....Its "OUR" country!!!

Love "Light" and Energy

_Don 　

References: The Privatization of Warfare, Violence and Private Military & Security Companies: A factual and legal approach to human rights abuses in PMSC in Iraq. (.pdf)

Spies For Hire

Source Watch: SAIC

9/11, SAIC and The Iraq War Plans

PBS: EXPOSE: American’s Investigative Reports (Archive Videos)

How Could SAIC Miss This? - Indeed "How Could They"?

By Donald F. Truax - Posting #212 - The 9/11 Operation

Caveat: Corruption [also Deception and Mimicry], that is the insertion of intentionally misleading information; corruption amounts to mimicking a known signal so well, that a receiver cannot distinguish the deceptive signal from the real signal.

But Senator.....don't be fooled; there's more to this than just a "payroll" contract scandal. If one exercises "discernment" they can deduce the "real" and "hidden" golden nugget here in that listed contracts are often nothing more than "front" contracts constructed to hide the real intended purpose of the said contract.

Specifically, it's just not the fact that a "contract(s)" existed in NYC prior to 9/11 which is key, but, as they say "things aren't always what they seem" ;)

Pay attention to the "Covert Bloggers Keyboard PeRpS" whilst they chirp chirp chirp.

Effectively, we now can see the "spin" machine at play to obfuscate:

The objective throughout, accordingly, has always been to keep the public in a state of uncertainly, where everything about these events is believable and nothing is knowable, which is the ultimate objective of disinformation.

Steven Pearlstein: How could SAIC miss this? (The Washington Post - Sat Apr 21)

It was just last June that SAIC executives and directors first informed shareholders that there might be a little $2.5 million overbilling problem with the contract and that federal prosecutors had brought criminal charges against six employees of an SAIC subcontractor. Shareholders had to read deep into Note 9 of that quarterly report to learn that there might be “a reasonable possibility of additional exposure to loss that is not currently estimable” that “could have a material adverse impact” on the company’s finances.

It was just six months ago that SAIC got around to firing the three executives (CityTime was expected to cost $63 million when it was begun in 1998, when the city awarded a competitive contract to a subsidiary of MCI. But the cost ballooned tenfold as the undertaking grew into what prosecutors say became an international conspiracy with lead contractors earning kickbacks for each hour worked by consultants, resulting in unneeded staff and inflated hours billed to the city. Much of the fervent drive to install the system could be traced to one powerful administration insider: the budget director, Mark Page. A veteran bureaucrat and descendant of the financier J. P. Morgan.) who were supposed to oversee the New York operations and letting shareholders know that the board of directors had formed a special committee and hired a couple of law firms to get to the bottom of things.

And it was a month ago that SAIC, acknowledging its responsibility in failing to detect a bribery and kickback conspiracy going on right under its corporate nose, agreed to repay the city $500 million of the $635 million it had received for the completed CityTime system. The settlement will allow SAIC to avoid criminal prosecution and the almost certain debarment from government contracting work that would follow.

deduce:

Most significantly, the vast majority of the work on the CityTime project was done not by SAIC employees but by employees and consultants at TechnoDyne under a no-bid, single-source subcontract that violated SAIC’s procedures, doubled the number of people working on the project and generated billing rates that ran as high as $160 an hour.

The Rise of the Vulcans:

During the summer of 1998, George W. Bush met with Condoleezza Rice at the behest of George H.W. Bush at the Bush estate in Kennebunkport, Maine. Rice had been director for Soviet and East European Affairs of the National Security Council under Brent Scowcroft during George H. W. Bush's administration and Scowcroft had been guiding her career ever since, ensuring she came to the attention of Bush Sr. "Eventually he was quite taken with her," Scowcroft recalled in an interview by James Mann for his book Rise of the Vulcans (2004).

According to Coit D. Blacker, Rice and George W. Bush also "bonded at Kennebunkport" in August 1998.[1] The several days of discussions that followed resulted in Rice agreeing to take charge of foreign policy for George W. Bush’s upcoming presidential campaign. Later that year Paul Wolfowitz, a former protégé of George Shultz and Dick Cheney, was taken on as well. Wolfowitz had also served as foreign policy advisor to Bob Dole during the 1996 U.S. presidential election. In early 1999, a team largely drawn from the middle echelons of the first Bush administration began to act as foreign policy advisors to George W. Bush

Spherion Will Takes it's London Subsidary Public - January 20, 2001

The Spherion Corporation (Spherion consultants are now at the heart of the criminal case), a recruitment and consulting company based in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., said yesterday that it planned to take its London-based subsidiary, the Michael Page Group, public in an initial public offering that analysts expect to raise $:800 million ($1.2 billion). Spherion acquired Michael Page in 1997 for $578 million. Spherion said it expected to sell an 85 percent stake in the unit to institutions and brokerage firms and use the proceeds to buy back its own stock.

FBI found direct ties between 9/11 hijackers/Saudis living in Florida - ribit ribit ribit

In addition, three of the four future hijackers had lived in Venice — just 10 miles from the house — for much of the year before 9/11. Atta, the leader, and his companion Marwan al-Shehhi, had been learning to fly small airplanes at Huffman Aviation, a flight school on the edge of the runway at Venice Municipal Airport.

A block away, at Florida Flight Training, accomplice Ziad Jarrah was also taking flying lessons. All three obtained their pilot licenses and afterwards, in the months that led to 9/11, spent much of their time traveling the state, including stints in Hollywood, Fort Lauderdale and Delray Beach, among other areas.

W.H.A.T....are you kidding me? Hmm...I guess I'm not the only TI?

VARs Flee from Massive NYC Fraud Case

VAR Executives Flee Country After Indictments In New York Corruption Case

Two executives from a former VAR500 company have fled the country after being indicted as part of an investigation into a New York City payroll project, according to reports.

Reddy Allen, CEO, and his wife Padma Allen, president and CFO, ran TechnoDyne, a Wayne, N.J.-based VAR that allegedly received more than $400 million as a subcontractor in the city's now infamous CityTime payroll project, fled several weeks ago to their native India after being subpoenaed to appear before a grand jury, according to the New York Daily News.

TechnoDyne was No. 295 on CRN's 2010 VAR500, and Padma Allen was previously named in CRN's Diverse 100 list last year. On May 31, the company shut down and fired all employees, according to Newsday. Phone calls to TechnoDyne's Wayne, N.J., office were not answered.

SAIC Technodyne CityTime Scoop (Thanks Suzanna :)

Denault will co-operate with the DOI and implicate the head of CityTime fraud, Joel Bondy.

(How Spherion’s performance was rated by Mr. Bondy had potential implications for the company’s ability to stay on the job and to win future city work.

Mr. Bondy, records show, was deeply impressed with the company’s work. According to two years of evaluations, for the periods from February 2008 through 2009, made available through a state Freedom of Information Law request, he gave the firm an overall rating of excellent, the highest possible level, for its work on CityTime.

And for each of the three areas covered in the evaluations, including fiscal administration and accountability, Mr. Bondy wrote the same seven-word comment in praise of Spherion: “The contractor’s work has consistently exceeded expectations.”)

Joel managed both Denault and Mark Mazer. Imagine being the exec director of OPA and not knowing what your two senior heads were doing on a $130 million/year project. Two similar structures to fraud the taxpayer. Denault + Technodyne on one side and Mazer + DA Solutions + Primeview on the other.

Jellybean is one of the managers under Denault. At least 4 other managers under Denault will be implicated and Technodyne.... look out for them

Spherion lost track of it's responsibilities and afraid of losing consultants to DA Solutions and Primeview ignored the red flags and went along with " the application is doing well and on track..."

Now lets look at the "big picture" that the public doesn't have a clue about:

Applying OPSEC to Govt Acquisitions as of 26/Oct/2010 [.pdf]

P111 Applying OPSEC to U.S. Government Contracts as of 2001 [.pdf]

p.14-#8 states: Effectively obtaining these goods and services ofter "requires effective management of a complex acquisition system encompassing the design, engineering, construction, testing, deployment, sustainment, and disposal of weapons or related items acquired under contract".

The DoD Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) identifies and validates DoD capability requirements through a document known as the Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)

The Defense Acquisition Management System (DAMS) seeks out the best material acquisition alternatives and strategies for fulfilling the ICD requirement communicated by the JCIDS in accordance with the law (FAR DoDI 5000.1/5000.2)

The DOD Acquisition Management System (DAMS); DAMS consist of five "discreet phases":

1. Material Solution Analysis Phase (MSA)
2. Technology Development Phase (TD)
3. Engineering and Manufacturing Development Phase (EMD)
4. Production and Deployment Phase (PD)
5. Operations and Maintenance Phase (OM)

It's important to note this outlay is as of 2006, but, the point here is twofold. First pay attention to the sequence (more on that later), the second one is that classified projects are usually hidden behind "front" projects.

DoD Infosec

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

JCIDS was developed under the direction of US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld

Reverse engineer this directive: Robots Scour WTC Wreckage - The New Mobile Infantry

Coincidentally, the story of Special Forces expert John Blitch and "'Ground Zero'" began on the first day of his employment with SAIC: September 11, 2001. According to Wired magazine, on 9/11/01 John Blitch happened to be leaving his position as a Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army's Special Forces to direct the Center for Intelligent Robotics and Unmanned Systems at the Science Applications International Corporation facility in Colorado. John Blitch had been charged by the U.S. Army's Special Forces with heading the Defense Department's Tactical Mobile Robots Program within the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, over the preceding three years.

According to Kevin Ryan, John Blitch had also been in his U.S. Army career chief of unmanned systems at the U.S. Special Operations Command (US SOCOM), a Command which conducts ' "covert and clandestine missions" ', and John Blitch had also won an award for his 'ground-breaking research in robot assisted search and rescue conducted during the Oklahoma City Bombing response.' According the Association for Computing Machinery, John Blitch used his Oklahoma City research to 'develop many of the robot platforms that were eventually used at the WTC.'

As stated in The Ominous Parallels Report: (link b)

Listed below are tactics that these CRIMINALS use to retain their “Plausible Deniability”:

Scientific Suggestion: Purpose is to conceal their actions.

Tactic of Replacement: Philosophical view that is used as “bait” to induce the collective to look in another direction i.e. to induce targets to spend their energy in the wrong direction, while the hidden plan un-folds.

Tactic of Counterfeits: When “truth” becomes evident, “others” ideals and symbols are employed for a defense, which, is a delay tactic that allows time to reconstruct a “false truth” leading a reaction in another direction.

Tactic of Inversion: To flip or discredit “proper” ideals that might appear relative, thereby putting the “proper” ideal in a condition that no longer poses a threat.

Tactic of Ricochet: To induce “targets” to take action against another “target” that eventually “ricochets” back on the original “target”, while THEY watch each target destroy each other.

Tactic of Scape Goat: To shift attention onto “other elements” those who are not responsible, thereby directing the reaction against “other elements”.

Tactic of Dilution: Mixing with something else.

Tactic of Surrogates: To act through “others”.

Progress of Dissolution: Processes of dissolving “death”.

Redirection of Action: Mixing “other elements into action, thereby stopping action against the threat posed to themselves.

Tactic of Deliberate Misidentification of a principle with its representatives: To discredit a representative of a given principle thereby discrediting the principle. This tactic employees “character assassination”.

Tactic of Replacing Infiltrations: A Trojan horse, employed to infiltrate an organization or person for the purpose of subversive control or distraction of said target.

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!....Its "OUR" country!!!

Love "Light" and Energy

_Don 　

References: Leaking War - ribit ribit ribit

Do we need another 9/11 conspiracy theory?

SAIC predicts layoffs with $1.2 trillion in federal cuts

Roots of the Scandal

DoD Infosec

The Rise of the Vulcans

Company on City’s Payroll Project Fires Three

The New York Times: SAIC Inc. (CYAsses)

The New Mobile Infantry

Robots Scour WTC Wreckage

Deception-IWC7-2006-BA [.pdf]

Covert Bloggers Keyboard PeRpS [.pdf]

Steven Pearlstein: How could SAIC miss this?

Spherion Will Takes it's London Subsidary Public - January 20, 2001

FBI found direct ties between 9/11 hijackers/Saudis living in Florida

VAR Executives Flee Country After Indictments In New York Corruption Case

VARs Flee from Massive NYC Fraud Case

SAIC Technodyne CityTime Scoop (Thanks Suzanna - hardy har har? :)

Applying OPSEC to Govt Acquisitions as of 26/Oct/2010 [.pdf]

P111 Applying OPSEC to U.S. Government Contracts [.pdf]

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION [.pdf]

JCIDS was developed under the direction of US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld

"Covert Action" - Confrontation or Collaboration? - or Meme?

By Aki J. Peritz and Eric Rosenbach - Posting #211

A report or more cultural programming? Should the CIA have briefed Congress on secret intelligence programs? What is the legal basis for the President's electronic surveillance program? Is the DNI actually in charge of the Intelligence Community?

Debate about intelligence issues has dominated public discourse since the attacks on 9/11. Unfortunately, the size, complexity and closed nature of the U.S. Intelligence Community often stymie individuals from differentiating fact and fiction on intelligence issues. The vast majority of members of Congress face an even more daunting task: They must provide important oversight with only a very limited background on intelligence. As the 9/11 Commission noted, "Few members of Congress have the broad knowledge of intelligence activities or the know-how about technologies employed."

The former Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Bob Graham, believed that members of Congress needed a non-partisan, objective reference that would provide a foundation for improving basic knowledge of intelligence issues currently facing this country. Hence, Eric Rosenbach and Aki J. Peritz, drafted Confrontation or Collaboration? Congress and the Intelligence Community at the Harvard Kennedy School in order to meet that need.

The revised version of Confrontation or Collaboration provides the public with a similar reference. Each chapter is a succinct memo that highlights important information about the Intelligence Community or an issue critical to our national security. The book begins by presenting basic organizational and legal issues pertinent to the Intelligence Community. Next, it traces the history of controversial topics like electronic surveillance and interrogations. Finally, it closes by highlighting new and current challenges that will undoubtedly dominate policymakers' agendas in the next several years.

The goal of Confrontation or Collaboration is to provide a guide to the complexities of the Intelligence Community to policymakers, legislators, students and the public. We hope this book leads to more informed debates and decisions about critical national security issues facing our nation.

CONTENTS

Background Memos

Intelligence Basics
Organization of the Intelligence Community
Congressional Oversight of the Intelligence Community
The Congressional Authorization and Appropriation Processes
Informing Congress of Intelligence Activities
Covert Action
National Intelligence Estimates
Defense Intelligence
Domestic Intelligence
Intelligence and International Cooperation

Issue Memos

Intelligence Reform
Interrogations and Intelligence
Electronic Surveillance and FISA
Cyber Security and the Intelligence Community
Overhead Surveillance
The National Interest, Energy Security and the Intelligence Community
Terrorist Safehavens and the Intelligence Community
The Role of Private Corporations in the Intelligence Community
The USA-PATRIOT Act
State and Local Fusion Centers

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!....Its "OUR" country!!!

Love "Light" and Energy

_Don 　

References:

The Ominous Parallels Report [Full Report]

Confrontation or Collaboration? Congress and the Intelligence Community [Full Report]