By Just Foreign Policy - Posting #197
In the wake of the latest IAEA report on the status of Iran's nuclear program, the confrontational tone of the US media and politicians has escalated considerably. What's more, the same media and politicians have been distorting or falsely characterizing the findings of the report and of the US and Israeli intelligence communities, taking them to confirm that Iran is currently trying to acquire a nuclear weapons when, in fact, they do not.
Distortions and falsehoods justified one recent US war. We won't let them justify another.
In December, Just Foreign Policy began to aggressively monitor the media for these misleading practices. And some major media outlets have responded. Check out who's been nabbed, who's repented, and who just won't admit that they've done wrong.
Washington Post:
Offense: "Iran's quest to possess nuclear weapons"
Outcome: Full Acknowledgement, Formal Correction
In December, Just Foreign Policy initiated a campaign to get the Washington Post to correct a photo gallery headline which asserted as if it were fact the mere allegation that Iran has a nuclear weapons program. Over 1500 Just Foreign Policy advocates emailed the Post ombudsman, Patrick Pexton. In response, the Post edited their headline and added an editor's note to explain the change. Mr. Pexton also wrote about the issue in his Sunday column.
Read more:
* Victory! WaPo Fixes Headline Claiming Iran Has Nuclear Weapons Program, Megan Iorio, Just Foreign Policy Blog, December 7, 2011
* On Complaints Over Iran Nuclear Weapon Claims, WaPo Ombud Rules for the Plaintiffs, Robert Naiman, Huffington Post, December 12, 2011
* Getting Ahead of the Facts on Iran, Patrick Pexton, Washington Post, December 9, 2011
Offense: "Iran's quest for a nuclear weapon"
Outcome: Text Corrected, No Correction Published
On January 19, 2012, a Washington Post article evoked a bit of deja vu when it claimed that "Israel’s supporters worry that Iran’s quest for a nuclear weapon and greater instability in the Middle East pose existential threats to Israel," despite the fact that the paper's own ombudsman had agreed just a month before that this particular shorthand was "misleading." An email was sent to Mr. Pexton, the Post's ombudsman, informing him of the infraction. The online text was subsequently corrected, about six hours after its initial publication. Read the full account, with original screenshots >
New York Times:
Offense: "Iran's nuclear program has a military objective"
Outcome: Acknowledgement; Text Corrected, No Correction Published
On January 4, 2012, the New York Times published an article that falsely claimed that the latest IAEA report assessed that "Iran's nuclear program has a military objective." The Times deleted this error without publishing a correction. What's more, on the same day, another article in the Times referred to Iran's "development of nuclear weapons" as if it were a known fact that Iran were engaging in such activity.
Robert Naiman's article on the issue was published in a number of outlets, including the Huffington Post and Al Jazeera. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting also picked up the case and issued an action alert. The Times public editor ultimately responded in his column, recognizing the justice of our criticism, but falling short of publishing a correction.
Read more:
* The New York Times misleading public on Iran, Robert Naiman, Al Jazeera, January 9, 2012
* On Iran IAEA Reporting Complaints, NYT Public Editor Rules For The Plaintiffs , Robert Naiman, Huffington Post, January 10, 2012
* Times errors: Iran’s nukes, SF’s voting, Arthur Brisbane, New York Times, January 10, 2012
NPR:
Offense: US policy "to convince Iran to give up a nuclear weapons program"
Outcome: Maintains Innocence, Will Not Correct
On January 8, 2012, NPR's Weekend Edition Sunday reporter Tom Gjelten said, "The goal for the U.S. and its allies … [is] to convince Iran to give up a nuclear weapons program." But one cannot give up something one does not have, and thus this claim implied that Iran has a nuclear weapons program, which is not a known fact. Just Foreign Policy began a campaign to get NPR to issue a correction, but the ombudsman instead defended the reporting with a rather sketchy linguistic analysis of the indefinite article.
PBS:
Offense: Panetta's assertion, "Are they trying to develop a nuclear weapon? No."
Outcome: Maintains Innocence, Will Not Correct
Just Foreign Policy joined FAIR in calling out PBS's NewsHour in their misleading edit of a clip in which Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta stated that Iran is not trying to develop a nuclear weapon at the moment; however, US intelligence believes them to be seeking a nuclear capability. NewsHour edited out the first part of the quote, only leaving the part about Iran seeking a nuclear capability, thus potentially misleading viewers into believing that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons.
PBS's ombudsman was admittedly "mystified" by the edit. Even the NewsHour editor responsible for the segment said that "it would have been better had we not lopped off the first part of the Panetta quote." However, PBS did not go so far as to claim wrongdoing, and refused to issue a correction.
Meet the Press:
Offense: Santorum made false claim that Iran doesn't allow weapons inspectors
Outcome: No Acknowledgement
On January 1, 2012, Rick Santorum, candidate for the Republican nomination for president, told David Gregory on NBC's Meet the Press that, unlike President Obama, he would "be saying to the Iranians, you either open up those [nuclear] facilities, you begin to dismantle them and, and make them available to inspectors, or we will degrade those facilities through airstrikes and make it very public that we are doing that." Gregory did not challenge this claim, even though he should have known full well that Iran's nuclear program is currently under inspection by the IAEA. NBC, Meet the Press, nor David Gregory responded to our criticism. Read more >
WAKE UP AMERICA!!!....Its "OUR" country!!!
Love "Light" and Energy
_Don
References: Current Actions
Iran: This Is What Propaganda Looks Like
WaPo: Fact-Check "Iran's Quest to Possess Nuclear Weapons"
Victory! WaPo Fixes Headline Claiming Iran Has Nuclear Weapons Program
On Complaints Over Iran Nuclear Weapon Claims, WaPo Ombud Rules for the Plaintiffs
Getting Ahead Of The Facts On Iran :o
WaPo: Still Getting Ahead of the Facts on Iran
The New York Times misleading public on Iran
On Iran IAEA Reporting Complaints, NYT Public Editor Rules For The Plaintiffs
Times errors: Iran’s nukes, SF’s voting :o
U.S., Iran Play Economic Knockdown
Tell PBS, NPR: No Proof Iran Has a Nuclear Weapons Program
Is NPR Fomenting A War With Iran? No.
PBS's Dishonest Iran Edit
A FAIR Catch But UnFAIR Conclusion
Meet The Press Transcript January 12, 2012
David Gregory Tell Rick Santorum There Are UN Inspectors in Iran
From: Stuart Bramhall
ReplyDeletehttp://www.columbia.edu/~hauben/Report_of_Arab_League_Observer_Mission.pdf
Have you seen this? It's the actual report issued by the Arab League monitors in Syria. Everything we have told about the monitoring is a lie.
From the report, it looks like the Assad government was pretty cooperative - in fact, more so than the armed opposition groups. The report leaves no doubt that Syria is in a state of civil war. Sibel Edmonds has been writing about NATO training the opposition forces in Jordan and Turkey.
Were you aware that Assad declared a general amnesty in Jan in which nearly all political prisoners were released? You sure don't hear about that in the mainstream media.